Model Teaching Logo Google Square White

Understanding Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development and Why It’s Important for Teachers to Know

Published March 20, 2026

Share This Article:

Home » Education Articles » Social Emotional Learning » Understanding Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development and Why It’s Important for Teachers to Know

As a teacher, you often witness your students struggling with the question of right or wrong each day in your classroom.  How can I teach that student that it is important to share?  Why did that other student share without being asked?  Why is it that some children follow classroom rules when no one is watching, while others struggle to abide by classroom rules at all times?  While some of the behaviors you witness may be due to a child’s personality and upbringing, you may also be noticing patterns of behavior aligned with their moral development.

What you may have also come to understand in your work as a classroom teacher is that children at varying ages have different levels of moral reasoning: a young child is more likely to snatch a toy out of another child’s hand, while a much older child will likely not exhibit those same behaviors.  Understanding how moral reasoning evolves and develops through a child’s life can inform how you approach classroom management, lesson design, and your students’ social-emotional development.

Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development

In 1958, psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg published his Theory of Moral Development to explain how humans progress through distinct levels of moral thinking. While his theory has been refined over the years, with additional factors acknowledged and incorporated into a more comprehensive understanding of moral development, Kohlberg, as the pioneer of these ideas, remains worth studying.  His work is a simple way to help us reflect on our students’ moral development at various stages of their lives.

Kohlberg organized moral development into three levels, each with two stages. You’ll now explore each level and stage of Moral Development described by Kohlberg, which helps you understand how and why people make certain moral decisions throughout their lives.

Level One: Preconventional Morality (Early Childhood Through Age 8-9)

If you teach early childhood or elementary grades, most of your students are operating at this first level of moral development. At this stage, children make moral decisions based on external consequences rather than internal principles.

Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation

In this earliest stage, children’s moral compass points directly toward avoiding punishment. A four-year-old doesn’t share the blocks in the classroom center because it’s the right thing to do, but because he doesn’t want to get into trouble. Children at this stage follow rules simply to avoid negative consequences.

Stage 2: Self-Interest Orientation

As children progress into Stage 2, their moral reasoning becomes more sophisticated but remains self-centered. Now, instead of just avoiding punishment, they’re motivated by what they can gain. A 7-year-old will likely be organizing the books in her reading center, not because she values order, but because she knows it will gain praise from her teacher for cleaning up without being asked. In other words, she views good behavior as something that leads to a positive outcome for herself.

What This Means for Your Classroom

Understanding that your young students think this way should inform how you structure lessons and manage behavior. Since these children are naturally focused on fairness and self-interest, you can consider how you might link your academic content to these concepts to help promote and develop their moral code. When teaching division, you might frame word problems as how to share items equally among friends.  Or, in a reading class, you might choose some books that feature moral dilemmas a child has to solve.

Level Two: Conventional Morality (Early Adolescence to Adulthood)

Most middle and high school teachers work primarily with students at this second level of moral development. At this level, young people begin to recognize and accept societal norms and values. Their moral decisions shift from self-interest to consideration of how their actions affect their personal relationships and their community.

 Stage 3: Good Interpersonal Relationships

Young adolescents at Stage 3 are very concerned with how others view them. They will be more likely to conform to rules not because of external rewards or punishments, but because they want to be seen as “good” people. They also seek approval from others and make moral decisions to maintain positive relationships. A middle school student might choose not to cheat on a test because he doesn’t want his peers to think poorly of him, rather than because of fear of punishment or because it’s the right thing to do. At this stage, an individual’s behavior is strongly influenced by their desire to be liked and accepted.

Stage 4: Maintaining Social Order

As students grow older and move into Stage 4, typically in later adolescence and even early adulthood, their moral reasoning expands beyond personal relationships to encompass their community or society as a whole. It’s at this stage that they really begin to understand and acknowledge the role of authority figures, and recognize that society has both written and unwritten rules.  They also understand that in different situations, behavioral expectations can vary.

What This Means for Your Classroom

Students at conventional morality will benefit greatly from opportunities to engage in thoughtful discourse. Encourage writing assignments, class discussions, and debates that explore the importance of relationships and social order. Rather than imposing all classroom rules yourself, involve students in setting classroom norms to help tap into their developing sense of collective responsibility. You can also pose real-world problems and have students collaborate to find solutions. Have them debate controversial issues, carefully facilitating discussions where multiple perspectives are heard and respected. Finally, consider service learning projects that connect classroom learning to community impact, such as fundraising for a cause, publishing informational brochures about local issues, or collecting donations for a homeless shelter.

Level Three: Postconventional Morality (Some Adults)

Kohlberg believed that fewer than 15% of adults reach the highest level of moral reasoning, in which individuals develop their own moral code based on universal principles. Even though fewer people above school age reach this level, it’s still worth understanding what postconventional morality looks like.

At Stage 5: Social Contract and Individual Rights

At this stage, people move beyond traditional laws to think about differences in individual beliefs. They realize that not every rule is black and white, and they begin to question whether laws are always just.

Stage 6: Universal Principles

Finally, at the highest level, individuals develop their own ethical code based on principles such as justice, equality, and respect for human life. They may even be willing to face negative consequences for following their personal beliefs.

What This Means for Your Classroom

High school teachers can help students begin their transition into adulthood by exposing them to gray areas in moral reasoning. When studying historical events like Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott, ask students to grapple with complex questions: Was she justified in breaking the law? Can a law be unjust? This stretches their thinking and plants seeds for more sophisticated moral reasoning, even if most students aren’t quite ready to fully operate at this level yet.

Try This:

The next time a student makes a choice in your classroom, pause and ask yourself: What stage of moral reasoning might be driving this decision?

Pay attention to the language students use when explaining their choices. Do they talk about avoiding punishment? Getting rewards? Being liked by peers? Or maybe following rules for the greater good? Their words will reveal where they are in their moral development and how you might frame a conversation to support their own moral development.

Once you identify patterns, adjust your approach to student discipline and classroom management accordingly. For students at preconventional morality, you might want to be sure to emphasize fairness and concrete consequences. For those at conventional morality, plan to create more opportunities for discussion about relationships and community impact. This simple observation practice can open up new insights into your students and new possibilities for how you teach them!

Academic References:

Adinda, Amalia Surya, et al. “A Theoretical Review of Language and Moral Development According to Chomsky and Kohlberg.” Linguanusa: Social Humanities, Education and Linguistic 3.1 (2025): 69-80.

Kohlberg, Lawrence, and Richard H. Hersh. “Moral development: A review of the theory.” Theory into practice 16.2 (1977): 53-59.

Tao, Tu, Vishalache Balakrishnan, and Azni Yati Binti Kamaruddin. “Research on moral reasoning applicable to the education of pre-service teachers: a systematic literature review.” Cogent Education 12.1 (2025): 2554324.

Turiel, Elliot. “Looking Back and Moving Forward: Historical Lessons for Current Research on Moral Development.” Human Development 68.3 (2024): 103-120.

Author: Model Teaching

Article by: Shayna Pond at Model Teaching

Model Teaching, a leader in K-12 teacher training & professional development.

Read Time: 8.2 Minutes

Popularity/Post Views: 2,147

Related Professional Development Courses

Developmental Theories PD Course

Applying Developmental Theories to Teaching Practice

This course will define developmental theories and how they drive teaching and learning practices. You will learn about various psychosocial, behavioral, and cognitive developmental theories, and why this knowledge is critical for educators.

PD: 20 Hours
Semester Credits: 3 Credits

Student Led Class-PD Icon

Teacher & Student AI Apps

We believe in using AI and digital tools to improve thinking, not replace it. Our apps are built to support teachers in their planning and students in their practice, designed around what research tells us actually works in the classroom.

Downloads & Resources

Kohlbergs Theory of Moral Development Infographic

Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development Infographic.

Download this infographic to explore Kohlberg’s three levels of moral development, from childhood reasoning driven by punishment and self-interest, through conformity to social norms in adolescence, to the rare adult stage guided by universal principles like justice and human dignity.

Share This Article:

Suggested Citation: Understanding Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development and Why It’s Important for Teachers to Know. Model Teaching, 2026. https://www.modelteaching.com/education-articles/social-emotional-learning/understanding-kohlbergs-thelory-of-moral-deveopment

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about Kohlberg's theory of moral development for teachers

Kohlberg's theory of moral development is a framework created by psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg in 1958 that explains how people progress through distinct levels of moral thinking over time. The theory organizes moral reasoning into three levels (preconventional, conventional, and postconventional), each containing two stages. Children start by making moral decisions based on consequences like punishment or rewards, and may eventually develop reasoning based on personal ethical principles. For teachers, this framework offers a practical way to understand why students at different ages respond to rules, fairness, and social expectations in very different ways.
The three levels are preconventional morality (typically early childhood through ages 8–9), conventional morality (early adolescence through adulthood), and postconventional morality (reached by some adults). Within these levels, the six stages are: Stage 1: Obedience and Punishment Orientation, Stage 2: Self-Interest Orientation, Stage 3: Good Interpersonal Relationships, Stage 4: Maintaining Social Order, Stage 5: Social Contract and Individual Rights, and Stage 6: Universal Principles. Each stage builds on the previous one, and people move through them in sequence without skipping stages.
In the preconventional stage, young children make moral choices based entirely on external consequences rather than any internal sense of right or wrong. A four-year-old shares blocks not because sharing feels like the right thing to do, but because he wants to avoid getting in trouble. As children move into Stage 2 around age 7, they start thinking about what they can gain from good behavior. A child might clean up the reading center without being asked because she knows it will earn praise from her teacher, not because she values orderliness.
Teachers can use Kohlberg's stages to inform both lesson design and classroom management. For younger students at the preconventional level, framing math word problems around sharing items equally or choosing books with moral dilemmas taps into their natural focus on fairness. For middle and high school students at the conventional level, involving them in setting classroom norms, facilitating debates on real-world issues, and assigning service learning projects all support their developing sense of social responsibility. High school teachers can stretch students toward higher-level thinking by presenting gray areas in historical events, such as asking whether Rosa Parks was justified in breaking the law.
The core difference is what drives the moral decision. At the preconventional level, children are focused entirely on themselves. They follow rules to avoid punishment or gain personal rewards. At the conventional level, the motivation shifts outward. Adolescents begin caring about how their actions affect relationships and their community. A middle schooler might avoid cheating not because of fear of consequences but because he does not want peers to think poorly of him. By Stage 4, students start recognizing that both written and unwritten rules hold society together.
Understanding where students are in their moral development helps teachers respond more effectively to classroom behavior and design lessons that actually connect. When a young child snatches a toy, that behavior looks very different through the lens of moral development than when an older student does something similar. Teachers who recognize these patterns can adjust their discipline approach. That might mean emphasizing concrete consequences for preconventional students while creating discussion-based opportunities for students at the conventional level. It also informs how teachers frame academic content, making lessons more relevant to students' current stage of reasoning.
Postconventional morality is Kohlberg's highest level, where individuals develop their own moral code based on universal principles like justice, equality, and respect for human life. At Stage 5, people begin questioning whether laws are always fair. At Stage 6, they may be willing to face negative consequences for standing by their personal ethical beliefs. Kohlberg believed fewer than 15% of adults ever reach this level, and research has generally supported that estimate. Most people operate at the conventional level throughout their lives.
Pay attention to the language students use when they explain their choices. Students at the preconventional level tend to talk about avoiding punishment or getting rewards. Students at the conventional level reference what peers think, what the rules say, or what is fair for the group. When you hear a student weighing abstract principles or questioning whether a rule itself is just, that student may be approaching postconventional reasoning. The next time a student makes a choice in your classroom, pause and ask yourself what stage of reasoning might be behind it. Their words will often reveal the answer.
Kohlberg's theory directly supports social-emotional learning (SEL) because moral reasoning and SEL both involve understanding relationships, making responsible decisions, and developing empathy. When teachers use moral dilemmas in class discussions, encourage collaborative problem-solving, or connect lessons to community impact through service learning projects, they are building both moral reasoning and core SEL competencies at the same time. Knowing which stage students are at helps teachers choose age-appropriate SEL strategies, like concrete fairness activities for younger children and relationship-focused discussions for adolescents.
Model Teaching offers a course called Applying Developmental Theories to Teaching Practice that covers Kohlberg's moral development theory alongside other psychosocial, behavioral, and cognitive frameworks. The course walks you through how these theories translate into real teaching and learning practices. It is available in two formats: a clock hours version for professional development credit, and a 3-credit graduate-level version for teachers pursuing salary advancement or recertification. Both options are self-paced and fully online.